<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OrrWhat? &#187; Candidate application</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnorr.me.uk/tag/candidate-application/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnorr.me.uk</link>
	<description>Random mutterings and musings of mine - a work in progress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://johnorr.me.uk/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>The man from DelMonte&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://johnorr.me.uk/2008/05/07/the-man-from-delmonte/</link>
		<comments>http://johnorr.me.uk/2008/05/07/the-man-from-delmonte/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assessment Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candidate application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church of Scotland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnorr.me.uk/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;he say </p> <p>YES!</p> <p>Apparently I&#8217;m now a candidate in training for the ministry. How scary a thought is that?</p> <p>Maybe need to spare a prayer for the congregation that gets me.</p> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;he say <span style="font-size: xx-large;"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: xx-large;">YES!</span></p>
<p>Apparently I&#8217;m now a candidate in training for the ministry. How scary a thought is that?</p>
<p>Maybe need to spare a prayer for the congregation that gets me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnorr.me.uk/2008/05/07/the-man-from-delmonte/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And I&#8217;m back</title>
		<link>http://johnorr.me.uk/2008/05/03/and-im-back/</link>
		<comments>http://johnorr.me.uk/2008/05/03/and-im-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assessment Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candidate application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church of Scotland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnorr.me.uk/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely drained as well.</p> <p>Well, I think it all went reasonably well. I think I put myself across as well as I was able and if I get a negative decision I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll be because of how I performed at the conference.</p> <p>I did have one glitch with the Church assessors&#8217; interview. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely drained as well.</p>
<p>Well, I think it all went reasonably well. I think I put myself across as well as I was able and if I get a negative decision I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll be because of how I performed at the conference.</p>
<p>I did have one glitch with the Church assessors&#8217; interview. Surprise! surprise! it was on the subject of baptism. I clarified what had been said in the local review report and that was fine but then I was asked what I would do if someone asked to be rebaptised. I stated that I wouldn&#8217;t do one but then the conversation got rather convoluted as one of the assessors wanted further clarification about what I had meant by offering a service of blessing or similar. We ended up talking at cross-purposes and we both turned to the second assessor and asked her understanding of what I&#8217;d said. She then summarised exactly what I&#8217;d said and affirmed the &#8216;correctness&#8217; of my viewpoint. Hopefully that&#8217;ll be ok and nothing will come of it. I did raise it as an issue with the Conference Director and he will &#8216;arbitrate&#8217; if it becomes an issue at their considerations.</p>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s all done now. There&#8217;s nothing more I can do and I don&#8217;t think I could have done anything more during the conference. The result should be out Wednesday or Thursday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnorr.me.uk/2008/05/03/and-im-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soon&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://johnorr.me.uk/2008/05/02/soon/</link>
		<comments>http://johnorr.me.uk/2008/05/02/soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 09:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assessment Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candidate application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church of Scotland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnorr.me.uk/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;it&#8217;ll all be over. Or more likely, just starting (regardless of outcome).</p> <p>In a couple of hours I&#8217;m heading off to the CofS assessment conference at Gartmore House. Can&#8217;t say as I&#8217;m looking forward to it. It&#8217;s a pretty stressful couple of days and I&#8217;ll be much happier when it&#8217;s over and done with. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;it&#8217;ll all be over. Or more likely, just starting (regardless of outcome).</p>
<p>In a couple of hours I&#8217;m heading off to the CofS assessment conference at Gartmore House. Can&#8217;t say as I&#8217;m looking forward to it. It&#8217;s a pretty stressful couple of days and I&#8217;ll be much happier when it&#8217;s over and done with. Still, it&#8217;ll be a major milestone. I&#8217;m more confident in my call than the last time (although I felt pretty confident then as well). I have answers to lots of questions I didn&#8217;t really realise were there last time.</p>
<p>Anyhoo&#8230; there&#8217;s ironing and packing to be done. And the hail has just started battering off the windows, so the drive will be lovely.</p>
<p>Must go check if Gartmore&#8217;s got wifi and I may blog from the conference (or not).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnorr.me.uk/2008/05/02/soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More paperwork</title>
		<link>http://johnorr.me.uk/2008/04/16/more-paperwork/</link>
		<comments>http://johnorr.me.uk/2008/04/16/more-paperwork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assessment Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candidate application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church of Scotland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnorr.me.uk/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just received a wodge of paperwork from 121 for my looming Assessment Conference (2-3 May). One of the things I need to do for it is prepare a piece for the &#8216;Topical Discussion Exercise&#8217;. This is an activity where each applicant introduces a topic and then facilitates a discussion on it, wrapping it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just received a wodge of paperwork from 121 for my looming Assessment Conference (2-3 May). One of the things I need to do for it is prepare a piece for the &#8216;Topical Discussion Exercise&#8217;. This is an activity where each applicant introduces a topic and then facilitates a discussion on it, wrapping it up at the end of the allotted time.</p>
<p>I am finding it quite difficult to think of an appropriate topic though. The main problem is that the applicants vary considerably &#8211; in age, in interest, in education. So, there&#8217;s not much point in doing anything &#8216;theological&#8217;. There&#8217;s a risk if I do something too technical or geeky that it won&#8217;t be understood. And if I choose something controversial then I run the risk of causing argument rather than discussion.</p>
<p>I have little recollection of what the chosen topics were last time (there are five applicants in each group, so that&#8217;s five discussions one after the other). I do remember that everyone is keen to help everyone else out because you don&#8217;t want to have your own discussion scuppered if you&#8217;ve been a bit bolshy in someone else&#8217;s. But I also remember that everyone is so keyed up and intense that the discussions have a slightly &#8216;forced&#8217;, even surreal, quality about them.</p>
<p>So, nothing too bland and nothing too inflammatory, nothing too technical and nothing too simplistic. Shouldn&#8217;t be too difficult to dream up something, should it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnorr.me.uk/2008/04/16/more-paperwork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
