Sep 112009
 

Blue Like Jazz book coverI’ve just finished reading Blue Like Jazz by Donald Miller. It’s one of these books you often find referenced in all sorts of blogs and websites. It also seems to be a ‘love it or hate it’ book depending on which side of the liberal/evangelical divide you sit on (a bit like The Shack, I suppose). But it’s been on my wish list for a while and so I spent some birthday vouchers on a copy.

It’s not a ‘big read’. It only took me a couple of days to get through it. It’s written in a light, very conversational tone so it skips along at an easy pace and engages you in the unfolding story. That story is Miller’s faith journey as he questions many of the religious baggage he carries as well as much of his behaviour and attitude towards himself and others. For that reason it’s very much about ‘experience’ and it has been heavily criticised for just that. In a sense it is very self-absorbed with faith growth being about growing as an individual and reconciling many of the big questions about relationships and life through a very personal lens. In essence, it starts with ‘self’ and aims God-ward.

Now this is often taken as a bit of an anathema by many who would suggest that we must always start with God and derive our meaning from that point. No argument there except that that simply isn’t the thought-world we live in these days. And interestingly (for me anyway), this was one of the themes that came out of my Masters research discussion the other day. It’s all very well having a go at someone’s ‘upside-down’ theological starting point, but if the language we use as theologians simply makes no sense to our current cultural context, we might as well be speaking Martian.

Blue Like Jazz is about ‘experiencing’ Christianity. Miller refuses to accept the label ‘Christian’ for himself, preferring instead to speak about Christian spirituality – he is a spiritual person who derives spiritual meaning from a Christian framework. I think his observations are and his experiences are exceedingly challenging and encouraging. It is a powerful testimony. I believe it could have been made even more powerful by more direct reference to scripture or theology, but that wasn’t the purpose of the book. It’s a book you could easily give to a ‘seeker’ (another contemporary term) and not feel you are Bible-bashing, but are still challenging their self-centredness and worldly outlook.

But I can’t help but feel that it still leaves a bit of a gulf between ‘true’ Christianity and some sense of a watered-down, post-modern, feel-good gospel. I wonder if Christian spirituality becomes another ‘commodity’ in the pick-n-mix religion supermarket and that if it’s all about being selfless and relationship friendly, then why not whichever framework works best for you? Why does it have to be a Christian one?

I know the book isn’t intended to be a theological tome that will encourage the pomo-generation to flock into churches, but I wonder if it short-changes those it does draw closer to Jesus. By ducking the “but why?” questions and giving an answer that is not really much better than “just because and anyway, it works for me”, it leaves open the possibility of creating either Christianity-lite or a lot of disappointed people when they discover they don’t have the underpinnings that support the times when the ‘big questions’ really matter (like when, as a friend might say, they are standing in the pits of hell asking, “how did I end up here?”).

As I say, the book isn’t meant to take people to that place (solidity, not hell), but rather expose them to a testimony that might get them engaging in the discussion about what Christianity (or Christian spirituality) is all about. And that’s not a bad starting point. Indeed it’s a place where many ‘hit them over the head with the Bible’ churches simply can’t even get people to in the first place. But the big question for me is how you then engage them in meaningful discussion that is theologically sound, God-centred and unashamedly Christian? And how to draw them beyond even selflessness into a concern and compassion for the world we live in?

  3 Responses to “Blue Like Jazz”

  1. It’s a start. For some that will be enough – and no harm in that. For others, the meat will come later – if they want. For still others it can revitalise a jaded faith. For those who wish to remain with their preconceptions and prejudices it will do nothing but confirm them in that. For those who like developed theology and hi falutin theological discussions it will always disappoint. These comments could apply to almost any popular “faith” book.
    Our faith is a journey – I hope it will never end and there is always a place in anyone’s journey for books like this. Some will love it, others hate it. But just maybe it could open eyes and hearts to Jesus more than any sermon ever could.

  2. You saying I’m hi-falutin’? 😉

    I’m trying to work out if I was disappointed with it. I don’t think I was. It’s a good read and a powerful testimony and as such fulfils its purpose exceedingly well. I guess where I now find my thinking is the ‘next step’. How do we draw people into a closer relationship with God without expecting them to relearn their spiritual vocabulary? I think that my Masters research work would find this a fruitful area – taking a pre-existing vocabulary (the postmodernist one) and redefining it in Christian terms. I suppose it’s not unlike what Paul did in the Areopagus – he took the pre-existent cultural context and redefined it.

    I think the arrogance of Christianity is that, all too often, we expect people to come to us. We expect people to fit in with our cultural context; learn our ‘Christianese’ (I’ve never been comfortable with the whole Christian-fellowship language of pious utterances and sincere blessings – I was never brought up with them and I never really learnt them); somehow just know how to behave in church, when to stand, when to sit and what the words of blessings and doxologies are.

    Even when we do ‘go out’, we take much of that baggage with us. We still wish to remain aloof from the world we are interacting with. We take our place as aliens here far too literally, forgetting that we are created beings in a world of other created beings. Far better surely to engage with the person as they are. Because surely that tells them that who they are is valued. Anything else is to suggest, however subliminally, that the only level worthy of engagement on is yours.

    Last night I happened to bump into a former lecturer. They asked what I was up to and I explained I was about to start a research Masters. They, tongue-in-cheek, expressed the hope that it was firmly rooted in the field of historical enquiry. I, also tongue-in-cheek, said that since we already knew Jesus was historical, what really mattered now was how we spoke of Him, hence the value of theology. Another friend who was listening reminded both of us that we could argue the academic side all we wanted but that what really mattered was how we lived as a Christian. The point, also meant light-heartedly, was a timely reminder that we can set too much store on hi-falutin’ arguments and that a book like Blue Like Jazz, is very much needed.

  3. You hi falutin! Tee he he he he. I had to use a dictionary for your previous post! But I do agree with your comments.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)